Thanks for initiating this, Raymond! I am wondering if Lazy consensus + may be just +1 from PMC/Committers is sufficient for this? Like you mentioned, given RFC review itself has approvals. We don't want to filter ideas too early without even giving a chance for proposer to fully express it in a wiki page.
We can put the final proposal to vote. On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 4:30 AM vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gurudatt, > > Thanks for providing the resource link to the voting procedure. > > Best, > Vino > > Gurudatt Kulkarni <guruak...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月13日周三 下午5:09写道： > > > The voting procedure for Apache projects is described here > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html. I am not sure if this is > > open to change. > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 2:20 PM vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Shiyan, > > > > > > Thanks for starting this discussion. > > > > > > +1 from my side > > > > > > Some additional thought: > > > > > > - Shall the proposal need at least one +1 vote from PMC? > > > - It would be better to explain what's the meaning of +0 and -1. > > > - In other communities, there is another concept when voting which > > > called: binding and non-binding. Shall we introduce it? > > > > > > Best, > > > Vino > > > > > > Shiyan Xu <xu.shiyan.raym...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月13日周三 上午11:54写道： > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > As per the RFC process > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HUDI/RFC+Process > > > > > > > > We usually start with an email thread to raise an idea before step 2: > > > > creating an RFC page. > > > > > > > > It'll be good to reach an agreement on how many votes (+1) do we need > > to > > > > proceed to step 2. > > > > > > > > The idea is not to make it too easy, otherwise it defeats the purpose > > of > > > > setting step 1, but also not to make the bar too high. > > > > > > > > I would like to propose at least 5 votes (+1) needed to proceed: > > > > - 2 votes from the committers, and > > > > - 3 votes from the community (can be committer or non-committer) > > > > > > > > Consider the growing community, we shall be able to increase the > > numbers > > > as > > > > deemed necessary. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? How about 5 votes to pass this meta-voting? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > - Raymond > > > > > > > > > >
