Thank you for the responses. It was resolved by upgrading the surefire
plugin version. Thanks to @prashantwason !

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:51 PM Ramachandran Madras Subramaniam
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> AFAIK codecov doesn't really work with the test framework. we only uplod
> the corbetura reports collected locally in the build system.
>
> Can you please verify that the local codecoverage reports pick up JUnit5
> changes ?
>
> -Ram
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:49 PM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This one is probably worth flagging with codecov support as well?
> > Does seem weird.. :/
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:14 PM Shiyan Xu <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > We're migrating all test cases to JUnit 5.
> > >
> > > This PR, as an initial step to enable JUnit 5, has migrated quite a few
> > > test cases. The test cases pass in green with no issue.
> > >
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dhudi_pull_1504&d=DwIBaQ&c=r2dcLCtU9q6n0vrtnDw9vg&r=KLmNyF_KPBPNb-BIVUsy8j_1tYfqyNa57jwVia1c9kM&m=N-aQ9xRn8pYpDY14UF6eW6uheElz-yPJJeF2t4iSnQc&s=rGcSb-T2BFSi6WdXoQAaMGCHMFUBUvFa2rkn31OXf6w&e=
> > >
> > > However, as you can see in the Codecov comment, the coverage decreased
> > > quite a bit. It's been observed that the test cases ran by JUnit 5 were
> > > somehow omitted in the report and resulted in the decrease.
> > >
> > > Is there anyone familiar with the Codecov settings? Or happen to know
> > > Codecov experts?
> > > I created this ticket for investigation. Any hint/suggestion on
> > > troubleshooting this will be highly appreciated. Please feel free to
> > > response to the thread or comment in the ticket.
> > >
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.apache.org_jira_browse_HUDI-2D792&d=DwIBaQ&c=r2dcLCtU9q6n0vrtnDw9vg&r=KLmNyF_KPBPNb-BIVUsy8j_1tYfqyNa57jwVia1c9kM&m=N-aQ9xRn8pYpDY14UF6eW6uheElz-yPJJeF2t4iSnQc&s=FpOe2NEJMjMsa6gvvuvi1N9YXQFRjweDMCSMYyqwtsk&e=
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Raymond
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to