Hi everyone, Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
We have created a Jira issue to track this work.[1] Best, Vino [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1037 Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org> 于2020年6月23日周二 上午6:38写道： > Great, looks like a JIRA is in order? :), given we all agree > enthusiastically > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 8:10 PM Gary Li <yanjia.gary...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1. > > That would be great to have a communication mechanism between downstream > > CDC applications chain. > > e.g. A->B->C->D. Right now I am using the commit timestamp to identify > > whether there is a new commit came in. But if I need to recompute app B, > > it’s difficult for C and D to aware they have to recompute as well, > > especially when the triggering frequencies are different. > > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 6:11 PM hddong <hongdd2...@gmail.com<mailto: > > hongdd2...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > +1. a great feature. > > > > Sivabalan <n.siv...@gmail.com<mailto:n.siv...@gmail.com>> 于2020年6月22日周一 > > 上午7:50写道： > > > > > +1. would be a nice addition. > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 12:02 PM vbal...@apache.org<mailto: > > vbal...@apache.org> <vbal...@apache.org<mailto:vbal...@apache.org>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1. This would be a really good feature to have when building > dependent > > > > ETL pipelines. > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 19, 2020, 05:13:45 PM PDT, vino yang < > > > > vinoy...@apache.org<mailto:vinoy...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Currently, we have a need to incrementally process and build a new > > table > > > > based on an original hoodie table. We expect that after a new commit > is > > > > completed on the original hoodie table, it could be retrieved ASAP, > so > > > that > > > > it can be used for incremental view queries. Based on the existing > > > > capabilities, one approach we can use is to continuously poll > Hoodie's > > > > Timeline to check for new commits. This is a very common processing > > way, > > > > but it will cause unnecessary waste of resources. > > > > > > > > We expect to introduce a proactive notification(event callback) > > > mechanism. > > > > For example, a hook can be introduced after a successful commit. > > External > > > > processors interested in the commit, such as scheduling systems, can > > use > > > > the hook as their own trigger. When a certain commit is completed, > the > > > > scheduling system can pull up the task of obtaining incremental data > > > > through the API in the callback. Thereby completing the processing of > > > > incremental data. > > > > > > > > There is currently a `postCommit` method in Hudi's client module, and > > the > > > > existing implementation is mainly used for compression and cleanup > > after > > > > commit. And the triggering time is a little early. Not after > everything > > > is > > > > processed, we found that it may still cause the rollback of the > commit > > > due > > > > to the exception. We need to find a new location to trigger this hook > > to > > > > ensure that the commit is deterministic. > > > > > > > > This is one of our scene requirements, and it will be a very useful > > > feature > > > > combined with the incremental query, it can make the incremental > > > processing > > > > more timely. > > > > > > > > We hope to hear what the community thinks of this proposal. Any > > comments > > > > and opinions are appreciated. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Vino > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > -Sivabalan > > > > > >
