Hello all, We are targeting the end of this week to cut RC. Here is an update of where we are at release blockers.
0.6.0 Release blocker status (board <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=397&projectKey=HUDI&view=detail&selectedIssue=HUDI-69>) , - Spark Datasource/MOR https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/1848 needs to be tested by gary/balaji (About to land) - Hive Sync restructuring (Review done, about to land) - Bootstrap - Vinoth working on code review, tests for PR 1876, - then udit will rework PR 1702 (In Code review) - then we will review, land PR 1870, 1869 - Bulk insert V2 PR 1834, lower risk, independent PR, well tested already - Dependent PR 1149 to be landed, - and modes to be respected in V2 impl as well (At risk) - Upgrade Downgrade Hooks, PR 1858 : (In Code review) - HUDI-1054- Marker list perf improvement, Udit has a PR out - HUDI-115 : Overwrite with... ordering issue, Sudha has a PR nearing landing - HUDI-1098 : Marker file issue with non-existent files. (In Code review) - Spark Streaming + Async Compaction , test complete, code review comments and land PR 1752 (About to land) - Spark DataSource/Hive MOR Incremental Query HUDI-920 (At risk) - Flink/Multi Engine refactor, will need a large rebase and rework, review, land (At risk for 0.6.0) - BloomIndex V2 - Global index implementation. (At risk) - HUDI-845 : Parallel writing i.e allow multiple writers (Pushed out of 0.6.0) - HUDI-860 : Small File Handling without memory caching (Pushed out of 0.6.0) Thanks, Sudha On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:41 PM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (we need to formalize this well) > But having just blockers land first, would help not just with rebasing, but > also wind down towards cutting an RC by end of week. > > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 2:53 PM Bhavani Sudha <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > As we are all hustling towards getting the blockers in, I wanted to > propose > > a code/merge freeze until we cut a release for 0.6.0 and restrict it to > > only merging blockers identified for this release. It would reduce > rebasing > > time for blockers in progress. If we feel some issue is a serious blocker > > we can discuss it here and bump it's priority. > > > > Please share your thoughts or concerns. > > > > Thanks, > > Sudha > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:19 AM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Given enough time has passed, Sudha can be our RM for 0.6.0. > > > > > > On the release blocker progress, we landed few blockers over the > weekend, > > > with some almost ready for landing > > > > > > Will send out a status update again tomorrow night PST! > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:17 AM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi anton. > > > > > > > > We were hoping to cut a release by last weekend. New target is this > > > > weekend! > > > > (tbh we were thrown off a bit due to COVID in Q2, given a lot of > > > > PMC/Committers had additional kid care duties. Now we are back to > > normal > > > > cadence) > > > > > > > > Going forward, I plan to start a discussion around planning, > > prioritizing > > > > and other release processes after 0.6.0. Would be great to have the > > > > community weigh in even more in these things upfront. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Vinoth > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 6:49 PM Anton Zuyeu <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi All, > > > >> > > > >> I apologize for possibly dumb question but when was 0.6.0 planned to > > be > > > >> released? Can't find any dates on Hudi related pages. > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:36 AM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Is anyone able to help with the at risk items? :) > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:07 AM leesf <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > @Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> Thanks for the reminder, > > marked > > > >> to > > > >> > > blocker, and next week would be ok to me. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> 于2020年7月30日周四 上午11:35写道： > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > @leesf <[email protected]> can we please mark the relevant > > > >> > ticket(s) > > > >> > > > with blocker priority, so it's easier to track? > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Looks like we are nearing a choice for RM. > > > >> > > > Any more thoughts on timelines? Looks like everyone so far is > > > >> leaning > > > >> > > > towards completeness of the release over doing it sooner? > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:36 PM vino yang < > > [email protected]> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > +1 on Sudha being RM for the release. And looking forward to > > > >> 0.6.0. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Best, > > > >> > > > > Vino > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > leesf <[email protected]> 于2020年7月30日周四 上午9:15写道： > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > +1 on Sudha on being RM, and PR#1810 > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/1810 (abstract hive > > sync > > > >> > module) > > > >> > > > > would > > > >> > > > > > also goes to this release. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Sivabalan <[email protected]> 于2020年7月30日周四 上午2:18写道： > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > +1 on Sudha being RM for the release. Makes sense to > push > > > the > > > >> > > release > > > >> > > > > by > > > >> > > > > > a > > > >> > > > > > > week. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 1:35 AM [email protected] < > > > >> > > > [email protected] > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > +1 on Sudha on being RM for this release. Also agree > on > > > >> > pushing > > > >> > > > the > > > >> > > > > > > > release date by a week. > > > >> > > > > > > > Balaji.V > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, July 28, 2020, 10:08:41 PM PDT, > Bhavani > > > >> Sudha < > > > >> > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks Vinoth for the update. I can volunteer to RM > > this > > > >> > > release. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Understand 0.6.0 release is delayed than what we > > > originally > > > >> > > > > discussed. > > > >> > > > > > Q2 > > > >> > > > > > > > has been really hard with COVID and everything going > on. > > > >> Given > > > >> > > that > > > >> > > > > we > > > >> > > > > > > are > > > >> > > > > > > > at this point, I feel by delaying the RC by a week or > so > > > >> more > > > >> > if > > > >> > > we > > > >> > > > > can > > > >> > > > > > > get > > > >> > > > > > > > some of the 'At risk' items in, I would vote for that. > > > That > > > >> is > > > >> > > just > > > >> > > > > my > > > >> > > > > > > > personal opinion. I ll let others chime in. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > >> > > > > > > > Sudha > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:48 PM Vinoth Chandar < > > > >> > > [email protected]> > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Just wanted to kickstart a thread to firm up the RC > > cut > > > >> date > > > >> > > for > > > >> > > > > > 0.6.0 > > > >> > > > > > > > and > > > >> > > > > > > > > pick a RM. (any volunteers?, if not I self nominate > > > >> myself) > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Here's an update on where we are at with the > remaining > > > >> > release > > > >> > > > > > > blockers. > > > >> > > > > > > > I > > > >> > > > > > > > > have marked items as "At risk" assuming we cut RC > > > sometime > > > >> > next > > > >> > > > > week. > > > >> > > > > > > > > Please chime in with your thoughts. Ideally, we > don't > > > take > > > >> > any > > > >> > > > more > > > >> > > > > > > > > blockers. If we also want to knock off the at risk > > > items, > > > >> > then > > > >> > > we > > > >> > > > > > would > > > >> > > > > > > > > at-least push dates by another week (my guess). > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 0.6.0 Release blocker status (board > > > >> > > > > > > > > < > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=397&projectKey=HUDI&view=detail&selectedIssue=HUDI-69 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >) > > > >> > > > > > > > > , > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > - Spark Datasource/MOR > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/1848 > > > >> > > > > > > needs > > > >> > > > > > > > > to > > > >> > > > > > > > > be tested by gary/balaji > > > >> > > > > > > > > - Bootstrap > > > >> > > > > > > > > - Vinoth working on code review, tests for PR > > 1876, > > > >> > > > > > > > > - then udit will rework PR 1702 > > > >> > > > > > > > > - then we will review, land PR 1870, 1869 > > > >> > > > > > > > > - Also need to fix HUDI-999, HUDI-1021 > > > >> > > > > > > > > - Bulk insert V2 PR 1834, lower risk, independent > > PR, > > > >> well > > > >> > > > > tested > > > >> > > > > > > > > already > > > >> > > > > > > > > - Dependent PR 1149 to be landed, > > > >> > > > > > > > > - and modes to be respected in V2 impl as well > > (At > > > >> risk) > > > >> > > > > > > > > - Upgrade Downgrade Hooks, PR 1858 : Siva has a > PR > > > out, > > > >> > code > > > >> > > > > > > > completing > > > >> > > > > > > > > this week > > > >> > > > > > > > > - HUDI-1054- Marker list perf improvement, Udit > > has a > > > >> PR > > > >> > out > > > >> > > > > > > > > - HUDI-115 : Overwrite with... ordering issue, > > Sudha > > > >> has a > > > >> > > PR > > > >> > > > > > > nearing > > > >> > > > > > > > > landing > > > >> > > > > > > > > - HUDI-1098 : Marker file issue with non-existent > > > >> files. > > > >> > > Siva > > > >> > > > to > > > >> > > > > > > begin > > > >> > > > > > > > > impl > > > >> > > > > > > > > - Spark Streaming + Async Compaction , test > > complete, > > > >> code > > > >> > > > > review > > > >> > > > > > > > > comments and land PR 1752 > > > >> > > > > > > > > - Spark DataSource/Hive MOR Incremental Query > > > HUDI-920 > > > >> (At > > > >> > > > risk) > > > >> > > > > > > > > - Flink/Multi Engine refactor, will need a large > > > rebase > > > >> > and > > > >> > > > > > rework, > > > >> > > > > > > > > review, land (At risk for 0.6.0, high scope, may > > not > > > >> have > > > >> > > > enough > > > >> > > > > > > time) > > > >> > > > > > > > > - BloomIndex V2 - Global index implementation. > (At > > > >> risk) > > > >> > > > > > > > > - HUDI-845 : Parallel writing i.e allow multiple > > > >> writers > > > >> > (At > > > >> > > > > risk) > > > >> > > > > > > > > - HUDI-860 : Small File Handling without memory > > > caching > > > >> > (At > > > >> > > > > risk) > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > >> > > > > > > > > Vinoth > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > >> > > > > > > Regards, > > > >> > > > > > > -Sivabalan > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
