Just out of curiosity - what's the blocker - you have an issue?  I had
originally done the code to make that work.

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 12:51 AM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> wrote:

> We still have 1 blocker issue from TimestampKeyGenerator issue with joda
> DateTimeFormatter. Sudha (RM) and Pratyaksh are going to look into this.
>
> In the meantime, here's the progress, plans around testing so far. If folks
> in the community can help test the release branch in the next couple of
> days, it would be of great help!
>
>
>    - Testing plan here: Stability tested by balaji running spark streaming,
>    Correctness (Nishith testing on release branch, Udit to help with EMR
> setup)
>    - Testing plan continued: Spark datasource MOR, .. Marker based
>    rollback, upgrade-downgrade (vinoth is on this)
>    - Testing plan : bootstrap (balaji tested for hive), udit has it working
>    for Presto in EMR.
>    - Testing plan: bulk_insert v2 (vinoth tested for correctness, file
>    sizes. ), performance (tested on a cluster, microbenchmarks)
>
>
> There will also be some blogs/docs to explain new stuff.
>
>    - Blogs to explain new stuff: sort modes (vinoth), simple index
>    (vinoth), bootstrap (balaji), multi delta-streamer (pratyaksh), Spark
>    Streaming/DeltaStreamer continuous mode blog (balaji)
>    - Docs: All missing docs will be added by Sudha.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:58 AM Bhavani Sudha <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Quick update on the RC.
> >
> > Found a build issue when building scala 2.12 and sent a PR for that -
> > https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/1976 . Working on resolving this in
> > the
> > release branch and updating RC. Will update soon.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sudha
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 5:56 PM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Sudha! This is means master is now open for regular PRs. Thanks
> > for
> > > your patience, everyone.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 3:51 PM Bhavani Sudha <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > We have cut the release branch -
> > > > https://github.com/apache/hudi/tree/release-0.6.0 . Since it is
> > already
> > > > Friday, we will be sending the release candidate early next week
> (after
> > > > some testing).
> > > >
> > > > Happy Friday!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Sudha
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 3:56 PM [email protected] <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Folks,
> > > > > We are continuing to work on CI stabilization and will cut the
> > release
> > > > > once we stabilize the builds hopefully tonight/tomorrow.
> > > > > Thanks,Balaji.V
> > > > >     On Tuesday, August 11, 2020, 09:15:05 PM PDT, Vinoth Chandar <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >  Hello all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Update on this. We have landed most of the blockers for the 0.6.0
> > > release
> > > > > and I am currently working on the last major blocker, HUDI-1013.
> > > > > We are working through some unexpected CI flakiness. We hope to
> > > stabilize
> > > > > master, cut the RC, and then open up master for regular PR merges.
> > > > > ETA for this is tomorrow night PST (Aug 12, PST).
> > > > >
> > > > > We will keep this thread posted!
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Vinoth
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:47 PM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Small correction:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Vinoth working on code review, tests for PR 1876,
> > > > > > This is landed!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:44 PM Bhavani Sudha <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hello all,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> We are targeting the end of this week to cut RC. Here is an
> update
> > > of
> > > > > >> where
> > > > > >> we are at release blockers.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 0.6.0 Release blocker status (board
> > > > > >> <
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=397&projectKey=HUDI&view=detail&selectedIssue=HUDI-69
> > > > > >> >)
> > > > > >> ,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>    - Spark Datasource/MOR
> > https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/1848
> > > > > needs
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >>    be tested by gary/balaji (About to land)
> > > > > >>    - Hive Sync restructuring (Review done, about to land)
> > > > > >>    - Bootstrap
> > > > > >>      - Vinoth working on code review, tests for PR 1876,
> > > > > >>      - then udit will rework PR 1702 (In Code review)
> > > > > >>      - then we will review, land PR 1870, 1869
> > > > > >>    - Bulk insert V2 PR 1834, lower risk, independent PR, well
> > tested
> > > > > >> already
> > > > > >>      - Dependent PR 1149 to be landed,
> > > > > >>      - and modes to be respected in V2 impl as well (At risk)
> > > > > >>    - Upgrade Downgrade Hooks, PR 1858 : (In Code review)
> > > > > >>    - HUDI-1054- Marker list perf improvement, Udit has a PR out
> > > > > >>    - HUDI-115 : Overwrite with... ordering issue, Sudha has a PR
> > > > nearing
> > > > > >>    landing
> > > > > >>    - HUDI-1098 : Marker file issue with non-existent files. (In
> > Code
> > > > > >> review)
> > > > > >>    - Spark Streaming + Async Compaction , test complete, code
> > review
> > > > > >>    comments and land PR 1752 (About to land)
> > > > > >>    - Spark DataSource/Hive MOR Incremental Query HUDI-920 (At
> > risk)
> > > > > >>    - Flink/Multi Engine refactor, will need a large rebase and
> > > rework,
> > > > > >>    review, land (At risk for 0.6.0)
> > > > > >>    - BloomIndex V2 - Global index implementation. (At risk)
> > > > > >>    - HUDI-845 : Parallel writing i.e allow multiple writers
> > (Pushed
> > > > out
> > > > > of
> > > > > >>    0.6.0)
> > > > > >>    - HUDI-860 : Small File Handling without memory caching
> (Pushed
> > > out
> > > > > of
> > > > > >>    0.6.0)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> Sudha
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:41 PM Vinoth Chandar <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > +1 (we need to formalize this well)
> > > > > >> > But having just blockers land first, would help not just with
> > > > > rebasing,
> > > > > >> but
> > > > > >> > also wind down towards cutting an RC by end of week.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 2:53 PM Bhavani Sudha <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > Hello all,
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > As we are all hustling towards getting the blockers in, I
> > wanted
> > > > to
> > > > > >> > propose
> > > > > >> > > a code/merge freeze until we cut a release for 0.6.0  and
> > > restrict
> > > > > it
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> > > only merging blockers identified for this release. It would
> > > reduce
> > > > > >> > rebasing
> > > > > >> > > time for blockers in progress. If we feel some issue is a
> > > serious
> > > > > >> blocker
> > > > > >> > > we can discuss it here and bump it's priority.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Please share your thoughts or concerns.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > Sudha
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:19 AM Vinoth Chandar <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > Given enough time has passed, Sudha can be our RM for
> 0.6.0.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On the release blocker progress, we landed few blockers
> over
> > > the
> > > > > >> > weekend,
> > > > > >> > > > with some almost ready for landing
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Will send out a status update again tomorrow night PST!
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:17 AM Vinoth Chandar <
> > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Hi anton.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > We were hoping to cut a release by last weekend. New
> > target
> > > is
> > > > > >> this
> > > > > >> > > > > weekend!
> > > > > >> > > > > (tbh we were thrown off a bit due to COVID in Q2, given
> a
> > > lot
> > > > of
> > > > > >> > > > > PMC/Committers had additional kid care duties. Now we
> are
> > > back
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> > > normal
> > > > > >> > > > > cadence)
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Going forward, I plan to start a discussion around
> > planning,
> > > > > >> > > prioritizing
> > > > > >> > > > > and other release processes after 0.6.0. Would be great
> to
> > > > have
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > > > community weigh in even more in these things upfront.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >> > > > > Vinoth
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 6:49 PM Anton Zuyeu <
> > > > > >> [email protected]>
> > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> Hi All,
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> I apologize for possibly dumb question but when was
> 0.6.0
> > > > > >> planned to
> > > > > >> > > be
> > > > > >> > > > >> released? Can't find any dates on Hudi related pages.
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:36 AM Vinoth Chandar <
> > > > > >> [email protected]>
> > > > > >> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> > Is anyone able to help with the at risk items? :)
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:07 AM leesf <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > @Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> Thanks for the
> > > > > reminder,
> > > > > >> > > marked
> > > > > >> > > > >> to
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > blocker, and next week would be ok to me.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> 于2020年7月30日周四
> > > > > 上午11:35写道:
> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > @leesf <[email protected]>  can we please mark
> > the
> > > > > >> relevant
> > > > > >> > > > >> > ticket(s)
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > with blocker priority, so it's easier to track?
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > Looks like we are nearing a choice for RM.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > Any more thoughts on timelines? Looks like
> everyone
> > > so
> > > > > far
> > > > > >> is
> > > > > >> > > > >> leaning
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > towards completeness of the release over doing it
> > > > sooner?
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:36 PM vino yang <
> > > > > >> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > >> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > +1 on Sudha being RM for the release. And
> looking
> > > > > >> forward to
> > > > > >> > > > >> 0.6.0.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Best,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Vino
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > leesf <[email protected]> 于2020年7月30日周四
> > > 上午9:15写道:
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > +1 on Sudha on being RM, and PR#1810
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/1810
> > > (abstract
> > > > > >> hive
> > > > > >> > > sync
> > > > > >> > > > >> > module)
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > would
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > also goes to this release.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > Sivabalan <[email protected]> 于2020年7月30日周四
> > > > > 上午2:18写道:
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > +1 on Sudha being RM for the release. Makes
> > > sense
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> > push
> > > > > >> > > > the
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > release
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > by
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > a
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > week.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 1:35 AM
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > <
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >  +1 on Sudha on being RM for this
> release.
> > > Also
> > > > > >> agree
> > > > > >> > on
> > > > > >> > > > >> > pushing
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > the
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > release date by a week.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > Balaji.V
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >    On Tuesday, July 28, 2020, 10:08:41 PM
> > > PDT,
> > > > > >> > Bhavani
> > > > > >> > > > >> Sudha <
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >  Thanks Vinoth for the update. I can
> > > volunteer
> > > > to
> > > > > >> RM
> > > > > >> > > this
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > release.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > Understand 0.6.0 release is delayed than
> > what
> > > > we
> > > > > >> > > > originally
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > discussed.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > Q2
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > has been really hard with COVID and
> > > everything
> > > > > >> going
> > > > > >> > on.
> > > > > >> > > > >> Given
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > that
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > we
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > are
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > at this point, I feel by delaying the RC
> > by a
> > > > > week
> > > > > >> or
> > > > > >> > so
> > > > > >> > > > >> more
> > > > > >> > > > >> > if
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > we
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > can
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > get
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > some of the 'At risk' items in, I would
> > vote
> > > > for
> > > > > >> that.
> > > > > >> > > > That
> > > > > >> > > > >> is
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > just
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > my
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > personal opinion. I ll let others chime
> in.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > Sudha
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:48 PM Vinoth
> > > Chandar
> > > > <
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Just wanted to kickstart a thread to
> firm
> > > up
> > > > > the
> > > > > >> RC
> > > > > >> > > cut
> > > > > >> > > > >> date
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > for
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > 0.6.0
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > pick a RM. (any volunteers?, if not I
> > self
> > > > > >> nominate
> > > > > >> > > > >> myself)
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Here's an update on where we are at
> with
> > > the
> > > > > >> > remaining
> > > > > >> > > > >> > release
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > blockers.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > have marked items as "At risk" assuming
> > we
> > > > cut
> > > > > RC
> > > > > >> > > > sometime
> > > > > >> > > > >> > next
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > week.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Please chime in with your thoughts.
> > > Ideally,
> > > > we
> > > > > >> > don't
> > > > > >> > > > take
> > > > > >> > > > >> > any
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > more
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > blockers. If we also want to knock off
> > the
> > > at
> > > > > >> risk
> > > > > >> > > > items,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > then
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > we
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > would
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > at-least push dates by another week (my
> > > > guess).
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > 0.6.0 Release blocker status (board
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=397&projectKey=HUDI&view=detail&selectedIssue=HUDI-69
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >)
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > ,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - Spark Datasource/MOR
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/1848
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > needs
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    be tested by gary/balaji
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - Bootstrap
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >      - Vinoth working on code review,
> > tests
> > > > for
> > > > > >> PR
> > > > > >> > > 1876,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >      - then udit will rework PR 1702
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >      - then we will review, land PR
> 1870,
> > > > 1869
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >      - Also need to fix HUDI-999,
> > HUDI-1021
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - Bulk insert V2 PR 1834, lower
> risk,
> > > > > >> independent
> > > > > >> > > PR,
> > > > > >> > > > >> well
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > tested
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > already
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >      - Dependent PR 1149 to be landed,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >      - and modes to be respected in V2
> > impl
> > > > as
> > > > > >> well
> > > > > >> > > (At
> > > > > >> > > > >> risk)
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - Upgrade Downgrade Hooks, PR 1858 :
> > > Siva
> > > > > has
> > > > > >> a
> > > > > >> > PR
> > > > > >> > > > out,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > code
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > completing
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    this week
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - HUDI-1054- Marker list perf
> > > improvement,
> > > > > >> Udit
> > > > > >> > > has a
> > > > > >> > > > >> PR
> > > > > >> > > > >> > out
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - HUDI-115 : Overwrite with...
> > ordering
> > > > > issue,
> > > > > >> > > Sudha
> > > > > >> > > > >> has a
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > PR
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > nearing
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    landing
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - HUDI-1098 : Marker file issue with
> > > > > >> non-existent
> > > > > >> > > > >> files.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Siva
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > to
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > begin
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    impl
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - Spark Streaming + Async
> Compaction ,
> > > > test
> > > > > >> > > complete,
> > > > > >> > > > >> code
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > review
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    comments and land PR 1752
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - Spark DataSource/Hive MOR
> > Incremental
> > > > > Query
> > > > > >> > > > HUDI-920
> > > > > >> > > > >> (At
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > risk)
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - Flink/Multi Engine refactor, will
> > > need a
> > > > > >> large
> > > > > >> > > > rebase
> > > > > >> > > > >> > and
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > rework,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    review, land (At risk for 0.6.0,
> high
> > > > scope,
> > > > > >> may
> > > > > >> > > not
> > > > > >> > > > >> have
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > enough
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > time)
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - BloomIndex V2 - Global index
> > > > > implementation.
> > > > > >> > (At
> > > > > >> > > > >> risk)
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - HUDI-845 : Parallel writing i.e
> > allow
> > > > > >> multiple
> > > > > >> > > > >> writers
> > > > > >> > > > >> > (At
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > risk)
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >    - HUDI-860 : Small File Handling
> > without
> > > > > >> memory
> > > > > >> > > > caching
> > > > > >> > > > >> > (At
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > risk)
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Vinoth
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > --
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > -Sivabalan
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
*Allen Underwood*
Principal Software Engineer
Broadcom | Symantec Enterprise Division
*Mobile*: 404.808.5926

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to