+1 On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 10:39 PM, nishith agarwal <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:05 AM Sivabalan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:57 AM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:44 AM Balaji Varadarajan > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > On Sunday, November 1, 2020, 09:13:44 PM PST, Gary Li < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 for biweekly meeting. > > > > Gary LiFrom: Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 2:01:22 PM > > > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] > < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > Subject: Re: Reg weekly sync meeting + users list as well. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:59 PM Bhavani Sudha < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > I was wondering if it would make sense to move the weekly sync > > meeting > > > to > > > > > bi-weekly to amortize time and be efficient, especially since > people > > > > across > > > > > different time zones attend. We could still retain the same time > but > > > > change > > > > > the cadence to one in two weeks instead. What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Sudha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > -Sivabalan > > >
