GitHub user danny0405 edited a comment on the discussion: RFC-80: Design proposal discussions
>From high-level, I feel like we should take read scenarios with higher >priorities here, since the warehousing is prune to be more reads than writes. >Based on this facet, A looke like a better choice. Another decision I want to confirm is do we want to bring column group notion for table that just has "column group"? would that bring in unnecessary overhead for read and write paths, can you plot a analysis here? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/hudi/discussions/14062#discussioncomment-14631800 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
