GitHub user danny0405 added a comment to the discussion: RFC-99: Hudi Type System
> Currently when looking at other table format projects in the space some such > as Apache Iceberg, the approach they take is defining a native type system +1 for option1, type system is very basic infra for a storage, it's better we keep format agnostic and avoid the dependency to other projects, we already see some issues like compatibility, efficiency for current Avro schema. It will gains more in the long run. And do you think we should also reference the SQL standard for these type naming conventions: https://blog.ansi.org/ansi/sql-standard-iso-iec-9075-2023-ansi-x3-135/? That would be more friendly for integration with SQL which is the major user API based on the investigation here: https://github.com/apache/hudi/discussions/13894 GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/hudi/discussions/14253#discussioncomment-14954175 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
