The main thing is that the parts that you do use work for you, and that you would be willing to help support the release through mailing list posts and source code patches.
As a committer, a +1 also implies that you would be available to review and apply patches -- even to the bits you don't use yourself. If the bits you use work for you, and you would be willing to help support the release as a whole, then a +1 would be a reasonable vote. People often vote +0 when it works for them, but other obligations would keep them from actively support the release at this time. (For example, you're in the middle of a "death march" at work.) -Ted. On 11/6/05, Brice Ruth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Clinton - > > There's quite a few enhancements/fixes that I wouldn't be able to test out > or anything, because anything I'm doing just doesn't exercise that code. Do > I just vote +0 for myself, or how does the voting procedure work in that > case?
