Congrats!
On 10/3/06, Jeff Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
woo hoo! congrats!
Sounds like a good plan.
Jeff Butler
On 10/3/06, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd rather just do a 2.2.1 deploy, beta, vote for GA.
>
> It should only take a week or two to get 2.2.1 through. We just waited
longer than normal for 2.2.0 for no good reason.
>
> Well, I had a good reason, I'm now a father of two! :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Clinton
>
>
>
> On 10/3/06, Jeff Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > As far as I know, the only issue with 2.2.0 relates to the JDBC/ODBC
bridge driver. Is this enough to cause us to make a 2.2.1 release, or
should we have a vote on making 2.2.0 GA with the caveat that there is a
problem with the bridge driver?
> >
> > Personally, I'd be OK with calling for a 2.2.0 GA vote because no one
should use the horrible bridge driver anyway :)
> >
> > I'm asking because the fact that it's labeled "beta" is causing some
questions about adopting it where I'm currently placed. IMO there's now
been sufficient time for a beta test with no major issues raised.
> >
> > Jeff Butler
> >
>
>
