Useful case where resultMap should not require any result elements

[Peter Andrews]

I have run into a case where I have an inherited class which has no 
additional members than what are already in the superclass. I have made 
some resultMaps, including one for the superclass. For the subclass I 
also created a resultMap that extends the superclass' resultMap. However 
-- there are no resultProperties that I wish to set since there are no 
member variables in the subclass.

I think the DTD for resultMap should be changed from result+ to result* 
to accomodate this case.

Thanks,

Peter Andrews

--
Peter Andrews
Software Engineer
Dartmouth Medical School
Computational Genetics
Rubin 707
(603) 653-3598
[EMAIL PROTECTED]