Just FYI, looks like the 0.9.1 artifacts are available now, but the release
page on the website hasn't been updated yet.

On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 9:46 AM Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com.invalid> wrote:

> With 8 +1 votes and no others, this RC passes. Thanks for validating the
> patch release, everyone!
>
> I'll get started on the next steps.
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 5:29 PM Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnyc...@apple.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Verified the cherry-picked fixes locally.
>>
>> - Anton
>>
>> On 13 Aug 2020, at 12:48, RD <rdsr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (Binding)
>> Validated signature, checksum and RAT. Ran all tests.
>>
>> -Best,
>> R.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:48 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> Bests,
>>> Dongjoon.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:46 AM John Zhuge <jzh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> Verified signature, checksum, and RAT.
>>>> Built the source and ran the tests.
>>>> Tried Spark 3.x with built iceberg-spark3-runtime jar
>>>> Tried Spark 3.x with maven-staged iceberg-spark3-runtime jar
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 2:17 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (Binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> verified sig/sum/build/test/license
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 1:24 PM Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Validated signature, checksums, and RAT. Built and ran tests and
>>>>>> staged binaries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 12:32 PM Carl Steinbach <
>>>>>> cwsteinb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LGTM
>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Ryan Murray <rym...@dremio.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Verify the signature: OK
>>>>>>>> 2. Verify the checksum: OK
>>>>>>>> 3. Untar the archive tarball: OK
>>>>>>>> 4. Run RAT checks to validate license headers: RAT checks passed
>>>>>>>> 5. Build and test the project: all unit tests passed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 6:56 PM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache
>>>>>>>>> Iceberg 0.9.1 release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The commit id is e7c59ec83bba9b2d934ef124d36eabfcdd33f319
>>>>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-0.9.1-rc0
>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-0.9.1-rc0
>>>>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/e7c59ec8
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-0.9.1-rc0/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>>>>>>> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged in Nexus. The Maven
>>>>>>>>> repository URL is:
>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1009/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is a patch release on top of 0.9.0 with several fixes:
>>>>>>>>> * A correctness fix for ORC timestamps before 1 Jan 1970 that were
>>>>>>>>> written by Spark
>>>>>>>>> * A read fix for ORC decimals with precision less than 18
>>>>>>>>> * A fix to support push-down predicates with negated expressions
>>>>>>>>> * Fixes for imports from other shaded Guava locations
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For the full list, see the 0.9.x branch:
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/0.9.x
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 0.9.1
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>> Netflix
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> John Zhuge
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Ryan Blue
> Software Engineer
> Netflix
>

Reply via email to