+1 (non-binding) Verified signature, checksum, license. Built and ran unit tests.
Thanks! Anurag Mantripragada > On Feb 14, 2022, at 1:32 PM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Validated sigs/sums/license/build/tests. > > -Dan > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:41 PM Kyle Bendickson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > License checks, various smoke tests for create table, update, merge into, > deletes, etc against Java 11 and Spark 3.2 and 3.1. > > - Kyle Bendickson > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:32 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * Ran license checks, verified checksum and signature > * Built the project > > Thanks, Amogh and Jack for managing this release! > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 10:22 PM Jack Ye <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > verified signature, checksum, license. The checksum was generated using the > old buggy release script because it was executed in the 0.13.x branch so it > still used the full file path. I have updated it to use the relative file > path. In case anyone sees checksum failure, please re-download the checksum > file and verify again. > > Ran unit tests for all engine versions and JDK versions, AWS Integration > tests. For the Spark flaky test, given #4033 fixes the issue and it was not a > bug of the source code, I think we can continue without re-cut a candidate. > > Tested basic operations, copy-on-write delete, update and rewrite data files > on AWS EMR Spark 3.1 Flink 1.14 and verified fixes #3986 and #4024. > > I did some basic tests for #4023 (the predicate pushdown fix) but I don't > have a large Spark 3.2 installation to further verify the performance. It > would be great if anyone else could do some additional verifications. > > Best, > Jack Ye > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 8:24 PM Manong Karl <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > It's flaky. This exception is only found in one agent of TeamCity. Changing > agents will resolve the issue. > > Ryan Blue <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 于2022年2月12日周六 08:57写道： > Does that exception fail consistently, or is it a flaky test? We recently > fixed another Spark test that was flaky because of sampling and sort order: > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4033 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4033> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 7:12 PM Manong Karl <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I got an issue failed on spark 3.2 > TestMergeOnReadDelete.testDeleteWithSerializableIsolation[catalogName = > testhive, implementation = org.apache.iceberg.spark.SparkCatalog, config = > {type=hive, default-namespace=default}, format = orc, vectorized = true, > distributionMode = none] · Issue #4090 · apache/iceberg (github.com) > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/4090>. > Is it just my exception? > > > -- > Ryan Blue > Tabular > > > -- > Ryan Blue > Tabular
