+ 1 (non-binding).

Thanks,

Amogh Jahagirdar

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:25 AM Péter Váry <peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, 17:31 Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 3:37 AM Piotr Findeisen <
>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> it looks it's part of the spec that's not connected to the other parts
>>> of the spec (like "dead code")
>>>
>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 08:30, Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:29 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> - Ajantha
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:50 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Following the latest community guidelines, I would like to start a
>>>>>> voting thread on removing the JSON spec for content file and file scan
>>>>>> task. Here is the PR for the spec change [1]
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > This was previously discussed in the dev mailing list [2]. While it
>>>>>> is good to add the JSON serializer in iceberg-core for ContentFile and
>>>>>> FileScanTask, their JSON formats don't need to be added to the core table
>>>>>> spec.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>> > Steven
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9771
>>>>>> > [2]
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/2ty27yx4q0zlqd5h71cyyhb5k47yf9bv
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to