+1 (binding) Thanks, Micah.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 8:29 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) on these spec clarifications > > Thanks, > Amogh Jahagirdar > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 5:08 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am +1 for the spec clarifications. >> >> I have left some comments for the time travel PR. we can discuss the >> details in the PR itself before merging. In particular, I am wondering if >> the time travel clarification can be add to the existing `snapshots` >> section of the spec (instead of adding a new `implementation notes` section) >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 3:54 PM Ryan Blue <b...@databricks.com.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Thanks, Micah! >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 7:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non binding) >>>> >>>> Thanks ! >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:35 PM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > I'd like to raise on modifying the table specification with >>>> clarifications on time travel and equality deletes [1][2]. The PRs have >>>> links to prior mailing list discussions where there was apparent consensus >>>> that these were the expectations for functionality. >>>> > >>>> > Possible votes: >>>> > [ ] +1 Merge the PRs >>>> > [ ] +0 >>>> > [ ] -1 Do not merge the PRs because ... >>>> > >>>> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > Micah >>>> > >>>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8982 >>>> > [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8981 >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ryan Blue >>> Databricks >>> >>
