+1 (non-binding) Thanks,
Amogh Jahagirdar On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 9:57 AM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:55 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> I would also suggest keeping the vote open for 7 days for a larger >> decision like this. >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:50 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:42 AM Russell Spitzer < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (bind) >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:34 AM Péter Váry <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> Ajantha Bhat <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2024. júl. >>>>> 26., P, 14:51): >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 5:16 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) for dropping JDK8 support with Iceberg 1.7.0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:29 PM Piotr Findeisen < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dropping support for building and running on Java 8 was discussed >>>>>>>> previously on "Dropping JDK 8 support" and "Building with JDK 21" mail >>>>>>>> threads. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As JB kindly pointed out, for a vote we need a "VOTE" thread, so >>>>>>>> here we go. >>>>>>>> Question: Should we drop Java 8 support in Iceberg 1.7.0? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PS >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) from me >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ryan Blue >>> Databricks >>> >>
