Let's just leave this thread as-is and not bump it.

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, at 15:11, Chris Atkins wrote:
> Hi Renji,
> 
> Sorry about that yes it is! I sent it in, but realised that it wasn't showing 
> up because I wasn't subscribed to the mailing list, so I subscribed and then 
> resubmitted after talking to Xuanwo on Slack.
> 
> Is there a way to close this accidental duplicate thread?
> 
> On 6 Aug 2024 at 5:06:40 PM, Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Chris:
>> 
>> Seems duplicated with this thread 
>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/7tw9qzz7yd8c4d7tcrwpmn7k0ojws7zh>
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 12:54 AM Chris Atkins <chri...@buildkite.com.invalid> 
>> wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>> 
>>> I'm following up on a discussion 
>>> <https://apache-iceberg.slack.com/archives/C05HTENMJG4/p1722750831522969> 
>>> from the #rust channel on the Iceberg community slack, so starting a thread 
>>> here too.
>>> 
>>> After seeing Xuanwo's and Song's recent proposals around leveraging 
>>> iceberg-rust to power parts of PyIceberg, I was thinking it could be 
>>> valuable to follow a similar pattern to build out Ruby bindings for 
>>> Iceberg. Being able to stand on the shoulders of iceberg-rust could really 
>>> help build out a robust Ruby interface, and also offer some opportunities 
>>> for interop with things like datafusion and opendal.
>>> 
>>> Recently in the Ruby ecosystem, writing native extensions in Rust has 
>>> become more popular, and tools like rb-sys and magnus provide a lot of the 
>>> required infrastructure. A good example is ruby-polars, which provides an 
>>> interface that is idiomatic Ruby but retains good symmetry with the APIs 
>>> exposed by py-polars. I wonder if we could eventually aim for a similar 
>>> type of symmetry between PyIceberg and a Ruby gem?
>>> 
>>> Is there much interest in this? I've started playing around with some of 
>>> the basics, and started out with a plain native Ruby implementation of some 
>>> of the basic metadata APIs, but quickly realised that building on 
>>> iceberg-rust could be more productive than writing it all from scratch.
>>> 
>>> *References*
>>> **
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/5570vbdkrk7mdswt4jqy45lv7y58pz4b
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/33c0nkc3k6646lvro1lv22pvhwlp50ss
>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/518
>>> 
>>> *Prior Art in Ruby*
>>> **
>>> https://github.com/matsadler/magnus
>>> https://github.com/oxidize-rb/rb-sys
>>> https://github.com/ankane/ruby-polars
>>> https://github.com/apache/opendal/tree/main/bindings/ruby
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris Atkins
Xuanwo

https://xuanwo.io/

Reply via email to