Hey Piotr, I missed this email, but Carls' reply pushed it to the top of my mailbox. As you can read on the list, the release is a bit more challenging than expected. I got the docker image fixed last Friday <https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/3099/>, and I'm building the artifacts right now. So technically the upper bound of 2 weeks is still possible ;) If you need it, feel free to start the release, I just think it is nice to get it in.
Kind regards, Fokko Ps: I now do know that we made the right choice at Iceberg to release all the languages separately :) Op ma 19 aug 2024 om 19:14 schreef Carl Steinbach <c...@apache.org>: > I'm +1 on doing the 1.6.1 release now, followed by 1.6.2 with the Avro > changes once they become available. I'm also available to help with the > release, though Piotr has already volunteered to be the release manager, > which is great. > > - Carl > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 10:24 AM Piotr Findeisen < > piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey Fokko, >> >> Given that Avro 1.11.4 Java release was "1-2 weeks" a week ago, it should >> be done or in progress by now :) >> It seems the discussion >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/yycy9bp21r4cgq68vk9d66bkqrb162tq stalled >> 5 days ago though. >> Should we restart it, or rather go ahead with the release and let Avro >> fix come as 1.6.2? >> The patch we would be releasing was merged on Jul 26th and it would be >> great to make it available to downstream projects. >> >> I volunteer to help with Iceberg 1.6.1 release, to share the operational >> cost. >> >> >> Best >> Piotr >> >> >> >> On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 at 22:43, Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hey Piotr, >>> >>> We had some delays with the Avro 1.12.0 release, mostly because all the >>> languages were released at once. On the Avro devlist, I suggested >>> releasing 1.11.4 just for Java because of the CVE. Realistically this would >>> be around 1-2 weeks. Does that sound reasonable? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Fokko >>> >>> Op wo 7 aug 2024 om 20:03 schreef Piotr Findeisen < >>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hey Fokko, >>>> >>>> thanks, that makes sense! >>>> Do you maybe know the timeline for the Avro release? >>>> Trino awaits the 1.6.1 release, so it would be great if we could get >>>> this rolling rather sooner than later. >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Piotr >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 at 16:33, Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey Piotr, >>>>> >>>>> The Avro release still has to be done. We have 1.12.0 which has >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10879> been released, but >>>>> that also drops Java 8 support, so we can't backport it. We still have to >>>>> run the 1.11.4 Avro release to backport the CVE fix. >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Fokko >>>>> >>>>> Op wo 7 aug 2024 om 16:15 schreef Piotr Findeisen < >>>>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you JB and Eduard for commenting! >>>>>> >>>>>> JB, which Avro version we would be updating to for the CVE fix? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best >>>>>> Piotr >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 13:36, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> That's fair (and I agree), but as these coming Avro releases include >>>>>>> CVE fix, I think it's worth considering. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 9:07 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>>>>>> <etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I don't think we should be including general dependency updates in >>>>>>> a patch release unless they are critical. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 8:13 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Hi, >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> It would be great to include the Avro update in 1.6.1 release. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> I agree for a maintenance release on 1.6.x, but I would like to >>>>>>> >> include a couple of updates. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Happy to drive this release :) >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Thanks ! >>>>>>> >> Regards >>>>>>> >> JB >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:19 PM Piotr Findeisen >>>>>>> >> <piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Hi, >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > ParallelIterable memory limit PR [1] is backported to 1.6.x >>>>>>> branch [2]. >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Are there any other bug fixes that should go into 1.6.1 release? >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Best, >>>>>>> >> > Piotr >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10691 >>>>>>> >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10787 >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>
