+1 Thanks, Anton!
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:58 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > I had to read up a bit, thanks for driving this Anton. > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op do 31 okt 2024 om 07:53 schreef Piotr Findeisen < > [email protected]>: > >> Thank you Anton, >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >> >> On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 05:07, John Zhuge <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:56 PM Anton Okolnychyi <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> - Anton >>>> >>>> ср, 30 жовт. 2024 р. о 21:32 Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> пише: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:28 PM Bryan Keller <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 30, 2024, at 11:03 AM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> -Dan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:51 AM Prashant Singh < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Prashant >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:16 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 - My comments are clear on the other thread for future proposals >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:18 AM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Great work and exciting functionality, but transferring concerns >>>>>>>>> from the other thread about the decision. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> Szehon >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 9:12 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:07 AM xianjin <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 2:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:45 PM Anton Okolnychyi < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi folks, >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > We have been discussing the new layout for position deletes >>>>>>>>>>>> in V3 for a while now. It seems the community reached consensus. >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like >>>>>>>>>>>> to start a vote on adding deletion vectors to the V3 spec as >>>>>>>>>>>> described in >>>>>>>>>>>> PRs 11238 and 11240. You can see a prototype of the proposed spec >>>>>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>>>>> in PR 11302. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > Design doc discussion thread: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ypt0jowf3zosw6f6bxt25jxc3vdgps9 >>>>>>>>>>>> > Spec changes discussion thread: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wyon0kvroxsmkxh153444xzscwbb68o1 >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes >>>>>>>>>>>> > [ ] -0 >>>>>>>>>>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because... >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > - Anton >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> John Zhuge >>> >>
