I don't think can include the statement: "Metrics must be accurate if written"
Equality deletes make this requirement very difficult to satisfy for some of the fields. The reason I suggested appendix was that we shouldn't be adding new requirements, just documenting field names for consistency across implementations. -Dan On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 8:07 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]> wrote: > @Daniel Weeks what do you think? > > I know both you and I had the opposite feeling here. > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 6:21 PM [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The content looks correct to me, but because this states a requirement >> ("Metrics must be accurate if written") I would rather move this content >> into the section on the snapshot summary instead of an appendix. >> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:30 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 non-binding >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:21 PM Steve Zhang >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 non-binding >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Steve Zhang >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 14, 2025, at 1:14 PM, Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 non-binding. >>>> >>>> >>>>
