+1 (binding)

Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test

Checked that the iceberg build version is correctly represented.

Ran into the hadoop commit test timeouts, but succeeded on re-attempt (I
believe we have fixes upstream for this).

-Dan

On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 5:20 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked signature, checksum, and licenses.
>
> Also ran Flink 1.20 with SQL.
>
> Thanks Russel for driving the release!
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 2:27 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> Verified signature, checksum and license. Thanks Russell for driving this
>> release!
>>
>> Huaxin
>>
>> On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 2:03 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Checked signature, checksum, and licenses.
>>>
>>> Thanks Russell, for running this release!
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Fokko
>>>
>>> Op zo 18 mei 2025 om 01:05 schreef Yuya Ebihara <
>>> yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com>:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> Confirmed that Trino and Starburst CI are green.
>>>> It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC
>>>> (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and
>>>> Snowflake.
>>>>
>>>> BR,
>>>> Yuya
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 2:13 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> - Verified signature, checksum, license.
>>>>> * Build + test passed using Java 17 on M1
>>>>> * Ran a few examples on Spark
>>>>> * Ran pyiceberg integration tests (
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/2011)
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Kevin Liu
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 10:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry I meant +1 (non binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le sam. 17 mai 2025 à 08:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +0 (non binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Signature and checksum are good
>>>>>>> - ASF header present in expected file
>>>>>>> - No binary found in the source distribution
>>>>>>> - Build is OK
>>>>>>> - Tested with spark and flink, need some update on Polaris
>>>>>>> - The aws-bundle, azure-bundle, gcp-bundle, kafka-connect-runtime
>>>>>>> LICENSE should include content for MIT and BSD (inline or dedicated
>>>>>>> folder), also, in case of dual license, we should "exclusively"
>>>>>>> select
>>>>>>> one. I gonna fix that, as it's like this for a while (I missed that
>>>>>>> before), it can be fixed in next release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 11:32 PM Russell Spitzer
>>>>>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Hi Y'all,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>>>>>> Iceberg 1.9.1 release.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > The commit ID is 5541cf000084b9e139d8dd22db44db7f592c3a2d
>>>>>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc0
>>>>>>> > *
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc0
>>>>>>> > *
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/5541cf000084b9e139d8dd22db44db7f592c3a2d
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>>>>> > *
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc0
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>>>>> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>>>>>>> repository URL is:
>>>>>>> > *
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1201/
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.1
>>>>>>> > [ ] +0
>>>>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members
>>>>>>> are encouraged to cast
>>>>>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1
>>>>>>> votes and more binding
>>>>>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to