+1. One question, how are we going to implement the deprecation in 1.11? Just update https://iceberg.apache.org/multi-engine-support/#apache-spark?
Thanks Kevin for driving this. Regards, Manu On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 10:06 AM Jacky Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > huaxin gao <[email protected]> 于2025年9月18日周四 06:37写道： > > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 3:29 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 3:07 PM Anurag Mantripragada < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Anurag > >>> > >>> On Sep 17, 2025, at 2:38 PM, Szehon Ho <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> Szehon > >>> > >>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 2:37 PM Russell Spitzer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1. But I'm always on the aggressive side of dropping old releases. > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 4:31 PM Alex Stephen > >>>> <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 to deprecating it. > >>>>> > >>>>> Keeping support for Spark 3.4 in Iceberg will encourage users not to > upgrade to a more modern version. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 1:33 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I’d like to bring up the topic of deprecating Spark 3.4 in an > upcoming release. Anton initially suggested this during our previous dev > list discussion about maintaining feature parity across the Spark versions > we support for 1.10. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Currently, we support two different Spark 3.x versions, 3.4 and > 3.5. Spark 3.4’s last maintenance release was in October 2024, and it is > now considered end-of-life. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What are your thoughts on marking Spark 3.4 as deprecated in 1.11 > and removing it in 1.12? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> For reference, here's the previous discussion thread on deprecating > Spark 3.3. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Kevin Liu > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> >
