Thanks for kicking this off, Amogh, and thanks everyone for the fix pointers.
I’m happy to volunteer as release manager for 1.10.1. I’ll track the candidates mentioned in this thread, monitor review progress, and verify backports. If there are other must-have fixes, please reply here so we can consider them for the patch. Thanks, Huaxin On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:53 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks all! > > >Would it be possible to include > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14153 to enable variant shredding > > Regarding this one, I don't think it should be in a patch release since > it's exposing an API on the data file writer and not really a fix. Besides > it is technically possible already to just use the lower level parquet > writer with the variant shredding spec and then produce a data file from > that (it's a bit more clunky for sure which is why that API change in the > PR is helpful) but don't think it quite meets the criteria for being in a > minor release. That criteria is primarily based on fixes. > > Thanks, > Amogh Jahagirdar > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 10:13 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Amogh >> >> Thanks for starting the discussion! >> >> I will create the PR to "relax" the LICENSE/NOTICE (to avoid the >> update pain before release). >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 6:29 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hey folks, >> > >> > Iceberg 1.10 was released 2 weeks ago and there was one issue around >> incorrect variant filtering reported that I think meets the criteria for a >> patch release. The fix PR is in (thank you Drew). I wanted to kick this >> discussion thread off in case folks had other issues in the 1.10 release >> that they think warrant a patch release. >> > >> > I also think this PR is a good candidate for a patch release; this is >> for addressing a long-standing issue where closing the S3FileIO during an >> event like moving broadcast variables from memory to disk leads to an >> unexpected closing of the http client. There's still some discussion on the >> approach of the fix but there's general recognition that it's a legitimate >> issue, so I think it'd be ideal to get this in for a patch release as well. >> > >> > I've also created a milestone here. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Amogh Jahagirdar >> >
