+1 (non-binding) Best, Prashant
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 4:59 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 3:07 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 4:00 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 2:19 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Op di 18 nov 2025 om 22:11 schreef Ryan Blue <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Looks good to me. +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 3:44 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to VOTE on adding an optional *min-rows-requested* field to >>>>>> the request of the */plan* endpoint so that the client can send a >>>>>> *hint* to the server to not have to return more rows than necessary. >>>>>> It is not required for the server to return that many rows since the scan >>>>>> may not produce that many rows. The server can also return more rows than >>>>>> requested. >>>>>> >>>>>> The proposed OpenAPI spec changes can be seen in PR #14565 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14565>. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Please vote within the next 72 hours:* >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Eduard >>>>>> >>>>>
