I believe it would be better for us to discuss other solutions. This CVE (https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs/security/advisories/GHSA-h956-rh7x-ppgj) in RustFS makes me think the project was vibe-coded, which is a red flag for me. In my view, this is not an acceptable vulnerability to exist in a serious project, so I have mixed feelings about how serious this project really is.
I've seen some people talking about https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/, but I don't have much information about how good it is. Overall, I believe we need to look into more options and understand the tradeoffs of each one before choosing. André Anastácio On Monday, December 29th, 2025 at 00:06, Jinghe Ma <[email protected]> wrote: > As discussed in this [issue](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/14638), > since the MinIO repo is under maintenance mode, we want to replace MinIO with > RustFS in [iceberg quick start > demo](https://iceberg.apache.org/spark-quickstart/#creating-a-table). > [RustFS](https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs) is an open-source and > S3-compatible distributed object storage system and is also a good > alternative. We have tested the whole replacement configuration locally, and > it worked fine. All the configuration changes and the test process are > attached in this [PR](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14928). We want > to move the replacement forward; if you guys have any concern about RustFS or > any other confusion, please let us know. > > Looking forward to hearing from you.
