Hi all, FYI the required changes were implemented: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15450
Thanks, Alex On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 9:49 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > With one binding -1, the vote does not pass. I will prepare the > requested changes and start another vote thread when we're ready. > > Thanks, > Alex > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 11:12 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > -1 (but I think we can address the concern easily) > > > > I just added a comment to the PR that's a blocker for me. We introduced an > > explicit enumeration of cloud providers which I strongly oppose codifying > > in the spec. > > > > That limits other providers from leveraging the signing portion of the spec > > without a spec change and is unnecessarily strict. > > > > This should be a simple update to address, but I can't support this change > > until we remove that. > > > > -Dan > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 8:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> +1 (non binding) > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2026 at 7:33 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> This is a second vote attempt in order to adopt the promotion of the > >>> remote signing endpoint to the main REST spec. > >>> > >>> Related links: > >>> > >>> ML thread: > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/2kqdqb46j7jww36wwg4txv6pl2hqq9w7 > >>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15450 > >>> > >>> Please vote within the next 72 hours. > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 Adopt the promotion of the remote signing endpoint to the main > >>> REST spec > >>> [ ] +0 > >>> [ ] -1 Do not adopt, please explain why > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Alex
