Yeah, that seems reasonable to me. On Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 8:08 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Harrison, > > I just read https://www.jeronimo.dev/the-two-versions-of-parquet/. > Adoption of the V2 spec seems to be low, but it makes sense to add an > option to configure it. > > Since this is a standard Parquet option, I don't think we need a > dedicated design document. > > Cheers, > Max > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 7:54 PM Harrison Crosse <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I opened #15677 to add a `write.parquet.page-version` table property for > configuring the Parquet DataPage version at the table level. iceberg-go has > already adopted this property (apache/iceberg-go#812). The iceberg-java > implementation is up for review in #15700. > > > > The scope felt small enough for a normal PR since it follows the > existing `write.parquet.*` pattern, but I wanted to check: does this need > an improvement proposal given it's a new spec-level property? > > > > Thanks, > > Harrison >
