+1 (non-binding) Verified on two machines:
- AL2 x86_64 - AL2 aarch64 Checks performed on both: - Signature: `gpg --verify` OK against KEYS from https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS - Checksum: sha512 OK - LICENSE and NOTICE present at the tarball root - Binary files found include Avro manifest-list fixtures and Puffin `.bin` fixtures under `crates/iceberg/testdata/`. Non-blocking nit: `.idea/vcs.xml` is included in the tarball. Will create an issue and send PR to remove IDE files if this wasn't intentional. - License headers: `license-eye header check` found 0 invalid ran via `go install github.com/apache/skywalking-eyes/cmd/license-eye@latest` received following error: apache/skywalking-eyes:latest` container image fails with `exec format error` on linux/arm64 — appears amd64-only - Built from source: `make build` passed on both (1 flaky test see note below) - Unit + doc tests: `make unit-test` passed on both One test showed flakiness during `make unit-test`: `catalog::memory::catalog::tests::test_update_table` failed once with assertion failed: table.metadata().last_updated_ms() < updated_table.metadata().last_updated_ms() at crates/iceberg/src/catalog/memory/catalog.rs:1880 I have cut the following minor changes to fix it: PR - https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/2395 Issue - https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/2393 On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 9:12 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > See my comment about binary files present in the source distribution. > > I verified: > - signature and checksum are good > - LICENSE and NOTICE are correct > - ASF header is present in all expected files > - There are three compiled binary test data files present in the source > distribution > (empty-puffin-uncompressed.bin, sample-metric-data-compressed-zstd.bin, > sample-metric-data-uncompressed.bin). > Source distribution must not contain any binary/compiled file. It would be > great to download these files at build time instead of being part of the > source distribution. Worth to consider in future release. > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:28 PM Shawn Chang <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello Apache Iceberg Rust Community, >> >> This is a call for a vote to release *Apache Iceberg Rust version 0.9.1*. >> >> The tag to be voted on is: *v0.9.1-rc.3* >> >> The release candidate artifacts are available at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.9.1-rc3/ >> >> The KEYS file for verifying signatures is available at: >> https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >> >> The Git tag for this release is: >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/v0.9.1-rc.3 >> >> Please download, verify, and test the release candidate. >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will remain open until >> the required number of votes is reached. >> >> Please vote accordingly: >> [ ] +1 Approve >> [ ] +0 No opinion >> [ ] -1 Disapprove (please provide a reason) >> >> To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please visit: >> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/ >> >> Checklist for reference: >> [ ] Download links are valid >> [ ] Checksums and signatures are correct >> [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are present >> [ ] No unexpected binary files are included >> [ ] All source files have ASF headers >> [ ] The project builds successfully from source >> >> For more details, please refer to: >> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release >> >> Thanks, >> Shawn >> > -- Thank You and Cheers, Kurtis C. Wright
