+1 (binding) Thanks for getting this clarification done.
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 7:00 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:33 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Thanks for tackling this ! >> Szehon >> >> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 1:50 PM Milan Stefanovic < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Iceberg community! >>> >>> I'd like to start a vote to update wording for the CRS parameter for >>> geospatial type. >>> >>> Current spec, depending on how it's read, might be interpreted as either >>> being suggestive or restrictive on how a CRS field is supposed to be >>> populated (whether `srid:` and `projjson:` are the only allowed formats, or >>> are they just suggestions/examples). Proposal is to update the wording so >>> that the purpose is clear and there is no ambiguity. >>> >>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15834. >>> >>> P.S >>> >>> There has been similar proposal in parquet community as well: >>> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/r5x0do8f241bpf565rx8s5s3wc9ogp0f >>> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/560 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Milan >>> >>>
