+1 (non-binding) from Trino perspective.

Confirmed that Trino CI is green.
It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC
(PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and
Snowflake.

Thanks again for running the release!

Yuya

On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 1:54 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
>
> Some minor improvements to note (see below).
>
> I checked:
> - source distribution
> -- signature and checksum are correct
> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good (nit: Presto and Delta Lake has NOTICE
> files that could be included in the Iceberg NOTICE)
> -- ASF header is present in all expected files
> -- No binary file found in the source distribution
> - AWS Bundle
> -- signature and checksum are correct
> -- nit: jar contains LICENSE/NOTICE in the root, but also META-INF/LICENSE
> and META-INF/NOTICE. Usually, we should have only META-INF/LICENSE and
> META-INF/NOTICE. Also, it seems LICENSE and NOTICE are packaged twice in
> the jar.
> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct (nit: aws-crt-java, aws-eventstream-java
> have different NOTICE then the "regular" AWS Java SDK).
> - Azure Bundle
> -- signature and checksum are correct
> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good (nit: NOTICE could include NOTICE content
> from reactor-core and reactor-netty). As for AWS bundle, filtering
> META-INF/LICENSE and META-INF/NOTICE in the shade plugin would be good.
> - GCP Bundle
> -- signature and checksum are correct
> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good (as for AWS and Azure bundle, filtering on
> the shade plugin would be welcome).
> - Flink Runtime
> -- signature and checksum are correct
> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good. Nit: LICENSE and NOTICE are packaged twice
> in the jar file. META-INF/LICENSE* and META-INF/NOTICE* should be cleanup
> in favor of the Iceberg LICENSE/NOTICE.
> - Spark Runtime
> -- signature and checksum are correct
> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 7:32 AM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Iceberg
>> 1.11.0 release.
>>
>> The commit ID is 6976e020b894f6a6777704df2b8c4458cb291ae9
>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.11.0-rc4
>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.11.0-rc4
>> *
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/6976e020b894f6a6777704df2b8c4458cb291ae9
>>
>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>> *
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.11.0-rc4
>>
>> You can find the KEYS file here:
>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>
>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository
>> URL is:
>> *
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1282/
>>
>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>
>> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here:
>> * https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release
>>
>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.11.0
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to