Thanks everyone for voting on how to represent content stats in v4. The vote result is:
+1: 5 (binding), 2 (non-binding) +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) Therefore, the VOTE passed. I'll merge the PR so that we can iterate on the implementation changes. On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 7:20 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner <[email protected]> wrote: > Adding my own +1 (binding) > > > On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 7:30 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 2:33 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 2:48 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 11:13 AM Wing Yew Poon <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for the direction. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 10:51 AM Talat Uyarer via dev < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 9:40 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 2:59 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey everyone, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I propose adding the Content Stats representation to the v4 spec in PR >>>>>>>> #14234 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14234>. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This vote acknowledges the direction we're taking regarding how we >>>>>>>> represent stats in v4. >>>>>>>> Changes to the stats representation can still happen until we >>>>>>>> formally finalize the entire v4 spec. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please review the PR and vote within the next 72 hours. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add Content Stats representation to the v4 spec >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not add Content Stats representation because... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Eduard >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
