+1 (non binding) Left a few minor comments that would be good to address.
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 6:57 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > ср, 20 мая 2026 г., 12:16 Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]>: >> >> +1 >> >> Thanks Dan and Talat for working on this! >> >> Kind regards, >> Fokko >> >> On 2026/05/20 09:36:34 roryqi wrote: >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > Gang Wu <[email protected]> 于2026年5月20日周三 16:58写道： >> > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> > > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 9:28 AM Alex Stephen via dev >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > Very excited for this! >> > > > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:39 PM Anurag Mantripragada >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> >> > > >> Thanks Dan and Talat. >> > > >> >> > > >> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:21 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> +1. This proposal is incredibly useful for disaster recovery use >> > > >>> cases with Iceberg. Thank you for driving this! >> > > >>> >> > > >>> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 4:50 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >> > > >>> wrote: >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> +1 Thanks Dan and Talat! >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:23 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> >> > > >>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Hey everyone, >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> I would like to start a vote to add relative paths to the v4 spec >> > > >>>>> as defined in PR #15630. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> This vote confirms the agreed-upon direction for relative paths in >> > > >>>>> v4. Changes can still happen until we finalize the v4 spec. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Please review the PR and vote within the next 72 hours. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> [ ] +1 Add relative paths to the v4 spec >> > > >>>>> [ ] +0 >> > > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not add relative paths (please provide reasoning) >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Thanks, >> > > >>>>> Dan >> > -- Regards Junwang Zhao
