Thanks for the great work, this is super exciting. I've been looking at
object storage optimizations lately, I'll find some time this week to take
a look.

On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 8:19 AM Varun Lakhyani <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I am looking for views on keeping the one flag true by default to use
> EagerInputFile in ManifestFiles read path (Major benefits in v4 Parquet
> Manifests).
> We have ready to run benchmark [1] and two independent sets of results
> showing similar benefits ~25 - 55% reduction in reading Parquet manifest
> depending on machine and file.
>
> I would appreciate the community's look and feedback on this - PR having
> changes [2] and whether we can enable this path by default.
>
> [1] https://github.com/varun-lakhyani/iceberg/pull/1
> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17284
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 6:29 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if anyone else has checked this out yet, but I think it's a
>> really exciting improvement. We should seriously consider making this a
>> default feature in the next release. Or potentially just have it always be
>> on.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 4:58 PM Varun Lakhyani <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we can flag property to enable this as default true, It would be
>>> a great improvement for v4 parquet manifest.
>>> Tried to do benchmarkings as extensive as possible.
>>> I would love to hear thoughts on this.
>>>
>>> Please review the PR once and would appreciate feedback.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 10:02 PM Varun Lakhyani <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I evaluated using EagerInputFile in v4 manifest reader path (parquet)
>>>> using ManifestBenchmark and S3 as object store and EC2 machine for jmh
>>>> benchmarking.
>>>>
>>>> This is to make sure we are doing a proper checklist while wiring this
>>>> EagerInputFile path here,
>>>> Detailed benchmarking setup and results are commented on in PR[1].
>>>> Using an EC2 machine in the same region (ap-south-1) gives *~28.4%* to
>>>> *~42.7%* betterment while comparing against baseline default while
>>>> benchmarking.
>>>>
>>>> Please provide review and feedback.
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17284
>>>> --
>>>> Lakhyani Varun
>>>> Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
>>>> Contact: +91 96246 46174
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to