Hi all,

Thank you for all the discussion this week on the community sync.
We had a couple of items raised around:
- The repository naming
- Verifying the implementations' correctness via the artifacts on both
reads and writes.

Please take a look and add your feedback on the proposal [1] document for
any suggestions, thoughts, or enhancements.
In addition, I'll check back in a week and see where the proposal goes, and
maybe set up a dedicated sync if folks would like to dive deeper on this.

Thanks,
Neelesh, Sung, Andrei


[1] Shared test fixtures for Apache Iceberg implementations Proposal
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qr82hccxJhWxKRT7B-3ylhOLSaJTYfc7hU51-mhzK6Y/edit?usp=sharing>



On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 7:16 AM Neelesh Salian <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Sung and I each started a thread on this recently [1][2], and together
> with Andrei the discussion converged on a single design.
>
> We've merged them into one proposal: a standalone, language-neutral
> repository of conformance fixtures - starting with static inputs paired
> with the expected value the spec fixes - modeled on parquet-testing, so
> each implementation checks its reading of the spec against a shared set
> instead of only against itself.
>
> There are working POCs: Sung's iceberg-testing fork [3] with pyiceberg [4]
> and
> iceberg-rust [5], and iceberg-go's engine-free variant checks [6].
>
> Document: [Proposal
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qr82hccxJhWxKRT7B-3ylhOLSaJTYfc7hU51-mhzK6Y/edit?usp=sharing>
> ]
>
> The plan: start with the smallest primitives (type strings, transforms),
> grow outward
> to binary fixtures; no harness and no central gate - each implementation
> pins the repo
> and asserts in its own suite; Java and Go first, covering v2 and v3.
>
> Feedback welcome on this and happy to set up a short sync for anyone who
> wants to dig in.
>
> Thanks,
> Neelesh, Sung, Andrei
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/964630c6q0jovs579x1jzb1t0o19jgjg
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/87cvl9gk0cjk1of7jh3nvm4lzvzxnc8m
> [3] https://github.com/sungwy/iceberg-testing
> [4] https://github.com/sungwy/iceberg-python/pull/1
> [5] https://github.com/sungwy/iceberg-rust/pull/2
> [6] https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/pull/1238
>
>

Reply via email to