This vote passes, for those following along on the PR we are softening the language to just "live" entries. Follow up on the PR if you have any further comments. Once we have consensus on the final wording there we can merge.
Thanks everyone for voting and checking out the PR On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 3:38 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 9:38 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Looking good. >> >> On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 9:09 AM vaquar khan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > Regards, >> > Viquar Khan >> > >> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2026, 12:00 PM Maninder Parmar < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, 11:27 PM Péter Váry <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 (binding) >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, 20:53 Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>>> Thanks Russell. >> >>>> >> >>>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:41 AM Russell Spitzer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Hi y'all, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> It's been a while, and I think we already have consensus here >> >>>>> but I wanted to raise this vote for awareness/consensus before >> merging. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Scan planning has stated since #4272 that duplicate live file paths >> in >> >>>>> a snapshot produce undefined scan results. This PR makes that >> expectation >> >>>>> explicit as a snapshot invariant in the main body of the spec. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the spec clarification in 17198 >> >>>>> [ ] +0 >> >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide reasons) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks for your time, >> >>>>> Russ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> -- >> Regards >> Junwang Zhao >> >
