+1 (binding) Checked signature, checksum, validation script. I also did a deep dive with my agents on license and notice, looks good! Thanks for working on the release!
Best, Kevin Liu On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 8:04 AM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified signature and checksums, and LICENSE-binary now covers the > modules that were missing in RC2. > > Thanks again for driving this release, Matt! > > Sung > > On 2026/08/31 11:47:37 Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for driving this. Ran the validation scripts, and checked the > source and binaries by hand. Excited to see this first release! > > > > Kind regards, > > Fokko > > > > On 2026/08/28 23:40:59 Alex Stephen via dev wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > I verified that: > > > - Licenses + notices look correct on convenience binaries (this was the > > > issue for the last RC) > > > - Tests pass > > > - RAT passes > > > - Checksums look good > > > > > > Thanks for driving the release, Matt! > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 9:33 PM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > I verified: > > > > > > > > - the source artifact checksum, signature, signing key, and signed > > > > annotated tag; > > > > - that the source archive matches the advertised commit and contains > the > > > > expected LICENSE and NOTICE files; > > > > - RAT and binary license inventory checks; > > > > - the build, unit tests, and integration tests from the downloaded > source > > > > artifact, including acceptance tests against a real Iceberg REST > catalog; > > > > - the signed checksums, contents, licensing, target metadata, and > commit > > > > provenance of all convenience binaries. > > > > > > > > I found no release-blocking issues. > > > > > > > > > >
