+1 (binding)

Checked signature/checksum and ran the tests.

Thanks Matt!

Kind regards,
Fokko

On 2026/09/30 16:33:50 Sung Yun wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> 
> - verified signature and checksum
> - tarball matches the rc0 tag
> - LICENSE/NOTICE/headers look good
> - ran verify_rc.sh on macOS arm64 with go 1.26.4, all tests pass
> 
> Sung
> 
> On 2026/09/30 16:25:18 Russell Spitzer wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> > 
> > Verified all the normal things (Checksums, Keys, Signatures)
> > Ran the dev verification suite included in the Repo
> > Complained about "Claude.md" to Matt :)
> > Ran all tests and such.
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 2:21 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > I verified the SHA-512 checksum and signature, matched the source archive
> > > to v0.7.0-rc0, checked LICENSE/NOTICE and license headers, and built the
> > > downloaded source.
> > >
> > > The default test suite passes with Go 1.25.9 on Linux: 3,344 tests passed.
> > > On Go 1.27.1, I observed one Puffin checksum error-message assertion
> > > failure; the call still rejected the corrupted input. I consider this
> > > non-blocking.
> > >
> > > Thanks for preparing the release!
> > >
> > > Xuanwo
> > >
> > 
> 

Reply via email to