+1 (binding)

On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 1:45 PM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 3:22 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 8:27 PM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 - Binding
>>>
>>> (note this went to spam for me)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 1:25 PM Uroš Bojanić <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for working on this!
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-10-02 22:23 UTC rahul mahadev wrote:
>>>> > [Reopning voting after going through reviews from @adutra]
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd like to call a vote on
>>>> > standardizing the client User-Agent format in the REST catalog spec.
>>>> >
>>>> > What a +1 endorses:
>>>> > - Clients identify themselves with the standard HTTP User-Agent header
>>>> >   (RFC 7231): whitespace-separated product/version tokens, most
>>>> specific
>>>> >   first (engine, then any integration or connector, then the Iceberg
>>>> >   library, then the runtime), with an optional parenthesized comment
>>>> for
>>>> >   extra context. Example:
>>>> >
>>>> >     Spark/4.0.0 iceberg-spark/1.9.0 iceberg-java/1.9.0 (scala 2.13.16)
>>>> >
>>>> > - When the header is sent, the Iceberg library token (iceberg-java,
>>>> >   pyiceberg, iceberg-rust, iceberg-go) must be present.
>>>> > - The header is advisory. Servers must not reject a request just
>>>> because
>>>> >   it is missing or malformed, and must not use it for authentication.
>>>> >   Servers may refuse operations from client versions known to be
>>>> unsafe.
>>>> >   It is not a capability negotiation mechanism.
>>>> >
>>>> > The spec change is in PR [2]. If the vote passes, the follow-ups are
>>>> > conforming the client libraries (java, python, rust, go) to emit this
>>>> > format.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > [ ] +1 Adopt this User-Agent format in the REST spec
>>>> > [ ] 0
>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not adopt (please explain)
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Rahul
>>>> >
>>>> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/d6hkx66o8qc1lolh11l1lmswxlq0bpj9
>>>> > [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17727
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to