+1 (binding)
On 2026/10/07 02:17:55 John Zhuge wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 11:18 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 10:26 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 10:17 AM Zheng Hu via dev <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi folks, > >>> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> btw, I left few comments in the PR > >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17727, and seems like there are > >>> few CVE scanining failures, are we blocking on that ? > >>> > >>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 8:26 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 (binding) > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 3:18 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 (binding) > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 12:29 AM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> Szehon > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 2:44 PM Jones, Danny via dev < > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks for driving standardization here! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Danny > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> *From: *Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> *Reply to: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> *Date: *Monday, 5 October 2026 at 22:31 > >>>>>>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> *Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] Recommend a standard User-Agent > >>>>>>> format for REST clients [REOPEN] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. > >>>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the > >>>>>>> sender > >>>>>>> and know the content is safe. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2026 at 15:23 rahul mahadev <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [Reopning voting after going through reviews from @adutra] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd like to call a vote on > >>>>>>> standardizing the client User-Agent format in the REST catalog spec. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> What a +1 endorses: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> - Clients identify themselves with the standard HTTP User-Agent > >>>>>>> header > >>>>>>> (RFC 7231): whitespace-separated product/version tokens, most > >>>>>>> specific > >>>>>>> first (engine, then any integration or connector, then the Iceberg > >>>>>>> library, then the runtime), with an optional parenthesized comment > >>>>>>> for > >>>>>>> extra context. Example: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Spark/4.0.0 iceberg-spark/1.9.0 iceberg-java/1.9.0 (scala > >>>>>>> 2.13.16) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> - When the header is sent, the Iceberg library token (iceberg-java, > >>>>>>> pyiceberg, iceberg-rust, iceberg-go) must be present. > >>>>>>> - The header is advisory. Servers must not reject a request just > >>>>>>> because > >>>>>>> it is missing or malformed, and must not use it for authentication. > >>>>>>> Servers may refuse operations from client versions known to be > >>>>>>> unsafe. > >>>>>>> It is not a capability negotiation mechanism. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The spec change is in PR [2]. If the vote passes, the follow-ups are > >>>>>>> conforming the client libraries (java, python, rust, go) to emit this > >>>>>>> format. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Adopt this User-Agent format in the REST spec > >>>>>>> [ ] 0 > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not adopt (please explain) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Rahul > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/d6hkx66o8qc1lolh11l1lmswxlq0bpj9 > >>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17727 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > -- > John Zhuge >
