On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Alexey Goncharuk < alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gianfranco, > > What do you mean by 'local cache' here? > > If you are talking about the local partition map, I do not think we have > such a method. The background exchange that is described in the ticket is > handled in controlled by the ResendTimeoutObject inner class in > GridCachePartitionExchangeManager. I cannot recall any cases when this > exchange would be needed from the top of my head, but it looks like you > need to do some investigation and code digging to check whether the > background exchange can be indeed safely removed :) > Alexey, I actually think that this ticket is named wrongly. After looking at the description, it seems that Yakov is suggesting that we do not send the exchange message if there are no changes to the exchange. Perhaps, we should be still sending something indicating that no change happened, otherwise, other nodes will hang forever waiting for the exchange to complete. Am I wrong in my understanding? > > 2015-08-28 5:58 GMT-07:00 Gianfranco Murador <mura...@apache.org>: > > > Hi Igniters, > > I 'm starting to implement this patch: > > Can you tell me if there is already a convenient method to see if the > local > > cache was updated last time interval ? > > Regards, Gianfranco > > > > > > -- > > Gianfranco Murador > > Igniter and Software Engineer. > > >
