Gianfranco, I agree that integration with Drools would be useful.
I think Yakov is questioning where this integration should be hosted. It looks like Infinispan is hosting it separately from their main code base. We can host it in Apache repo, or we can create a separate project for it, for example, here: https://github.com/apacheignite Looks like Drools is licensed under ASL2.0, so we could really do it either way. Would be interesting do find out what others think. D. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Gianfranco Murador <mura...@apache.org> wrote: > Yakov, > So I guess that integration should only affect the way JBPM interacts with > Ignite ? > I think that a module dedicated to ignite could provide APIs more advanced > than simple get and put on a grid. Infinispan already provides a second > level cache Ignite does, but that does not mean that > Ignite does not have to provide similar feature. > Interacting JBPM with a dedicated module of ignite we could do processing > on the workflow instance in advanced mode, exploiting the near cache in a > distributed environment. > Maybe the module might not be ready for the release of version 1.5. > Ultimately, who knows better than you that Ignite is more advanced than > Infinspan ? > > > > 2015-09-29 16:52 GMT+02:00 Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org>: > > > Igniters, > > > > Given we somehow agreed on most of the scope, can everyone please cleanup > > JIRA queues accordingly? > > > > --Yakov > > > > > > -- > Gianfranco Murador > Igniter and Software Engineer. >
