Hi Dmitriy Setrakyan, I have subscribe to the dev list.
> 在 2015年11月5日，上午9:29，Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> 写道： > > Hi wmz7year, > > Can you please properly subscribe to the dev list? This way I will not have > to manually approve the emails you send out to the dev list. > > All you need to do is send an empty email to “dev-subscr...@ignite.apache.org > <mailto:dev-subscr...@ignite.apache.org>” and then simply reply to the reply > you receive. > > D. > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:22 PM, 姜 为 <ydswcy...@gmail.com > <mailto:ydswcy...@gmail.com>> wrote: > In the distributed case, the different types of servers need to transfer > objects that implement a unified interface, > > but each type of server implementation mechanisms are not the same, to > achieve the object's class will realize Externalizable interface. > > Like this: > > interface A extends Externalizable { > void a(); > > void b(); > } > > > class B implement A { > void a(){ > do something > } > > void b(){ > throw new unsupporte execution; > } > > implement Externalizable read and write…. > } > > class C implement A { > void a(){ > throw new unsupporte execution; > } > > void b(){ > do something > } > implement Externalizable read and write…. > } > > > Then do this for other type servers: > IgniteCompute.call(new IgniteCallable() { A.a() or A.b() }); > > > > > > 在 2015年11月4日，下午9:19，Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com > > <mailto:dma...@gridgain.com>> 写道： > > > > Hi wmz7year (sorry, don't know your real name), > > > > Thanks for showing the interest in Ignite and contributing to it but I'm > > afraid that we can't accept this particular contribution. > > > > The reason is that the checksum verification is essential for objects > > serialized with OptimizedMarshaller. It helps to prevent ClassCastException > > and other weird stuff. > > > > Please share with us your use case that made you to modify > > OptimizedMarshaller. Probably we will able to help you with this. > > > > P.S. > > If you haven't subscribed to dev and user lists please do this. > > > > -- > > Denis > > > > > > On 11/4/2015 12:52 PM, wmz7year wrote: > >> GitHub user wmz7year opened a pull request: > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/200 > >> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/200> > >> > >> IGNITE-1854 > >> > >> > >> You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: > >> > >> $ git pull https://github.com/wmz7year/ignite > >> <https://github.com/wmz7year/ignite> ignite-1854 > >> > >> Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/200.patch > >> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/200.patch> > >> > >> To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch > >> with (at least) the following in the commit message: > >> > >> This closes #200 > >> ---- > >> commit 940db9ffc8e83149c2177de35dc7322fa972bd6e > >> Author: wmz7year <ydswcy...@gmail.com <mailto:ydswcy...@gmail.com>> > >> Date: 2015-11-04T09:51:28Z > >> > >> IGNITE-1854 > >> > >> ---- > >> > >> > >> --- > >> If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your > >> reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature > >> enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please > >> contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org > >> <mailto:infrastruct...@apache.org> or file a JIRA ticket > >> with INFRA. > >> --- > > > >
