FYI, OSGi sorts version qualifiers lexicographically: http://wiki.osgi.org/wiki/Bundle-Version
Sergi 2015-12-01 18:55 GMT+03:00 Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com>: > Anton, > > Since we are not going to mix *b1 *with *beta1* this should work well. > > Nevertheless It seems that it will work well for OSGi only if we will mark > our releases as *final*, but I believe > it will be enough to mark them this way only in OSGI Bundle-Version, I > think someone involved in Ignite OSGi > efforts can clarify this better. > > http://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0-b1&b=1.5.0-final > http://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0-b1&b=1.5.0 > > Sergi > > > > 2015-12-01 18:40 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com>: > >> Sergi, >> >> Is *b1* equals to *beta1* in OSGi case? >> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > I like “1.5.0-b1”, etc. Let’s use this for now, as it seems to work. >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Sergi Vladykin < >> sergi.vlady...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > The most promising way which should work for both Maven and OSGi is to >> > use >> > > *beta* for EA and use *final *for releases. >> > > >> > > http://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0-final&b=1.5.0-beta1 >> > > http://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0&b=1.5.0-beta1 >> > > >> > > Sergi >> > > >> > > >> > > 2015-12-01 18:16 GMT+03:00 Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com>: >> > > >> > > > Dmitriy, >> > > > >> > > > Yakov just sent maven output which says that >> > > > >> > > > *1.5.0 < 1.5.0-EA1* >> > > > >> > > > *1.5.0-EA1 > 1.5.0-final* >> > > > >> > > > That's exactly what I was talking about. >> > > > >> > > > Sergi >> > > > >> > > > 2015-12-01 18:12 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org >> >: >> > > > >> > > >> AFAIK, in maven you can have versions with qualifiers, like >> 1.5.0-ea1 >> > > and >> > > >> standard versions, like 1.5.0. >> > > >> >> > > >> According to this article [1], all the versions with a qualifier, >> such >> > > as >> > > >> “-ea” will be considered older than the versions without >> qualifiers. >> > > This >> > > >> means that 1.5.0-ea1 will be older than 1.5.0. Seems like the >> > versioning >> > > >> scheme proposed by Yakov would work. >> > > >> >> > > >> [1] - >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> https://docs.oracle.com/middleware/1212/core/MAVEN/maven_version.htm#MAVEN8855 >> > > >> >> > > >> D. >> > > >> >> > > >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org >> > >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> > I have got the following output: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > $ java -cp maven-core-3.3.9.jar:maven-artifact-3.3.9.jar >> > > >> > org.apache.maven.artifact.versioning.ComparableVersion 1.5.0 >> > 1.5.0-EA1 >> > > >> > 1.5.0-final >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Display parameters as parsed by Maven (in canonical form) and >> > > comparison >> > > >> > result: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > 1. 1.5.0 == 1.5 >> > > >> > >> > > >> > 1.5.0 < 1.5.0-EA1 >> > > >> > >> > > >> > 2. 1.5.0-EA1 == 1.5-ea-1 >> > > >> > >> > > >> > 1.5.0-EA1 > 1.5.0-final >> > > >> > >> > > >> > 3. 1.5.0-final == 1.5 >> > > >> > >> > > >> > --Yakov >> > > >> > >> > > >> > 2015-12-01 18:07 GMT+03:00 Sergi Vladykin < >> sergi.vlady...@gmail.com >> > >: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Also it is an interesting subject with respect to OSGi >> versioning >> > > >> because >> > > >> > > Maven and OSGi versions are >> > > >> > > somewhat conflicting as well. See [1] >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > [1] http://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0-final&b=1.5.0-ea >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Sergi >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > 2015-12-01 17:56 GMT+03:00 Raul Kripalani <ra...@apache.org>: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > It is different when the keyword is part of the version >> > > >> > (1.1.1.RELEASE), >> > > >> > > > like Spring, and when it's a qualifier (1.1.1-RELEASE). >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > Maven treats both cases differently. >> > > >> > > > On 1 Dec 2015 14:52, "Yakov Zhdanov" <yzhda...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > Sergi, very good point! Guys, it seems that EA is not a >> good >> > > >> choice. >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > However, how many of you have ever used RELEASE as version >> in >> > > >> maven >> > > >> > or >> > > >> > > > > version range? >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > --Yakov >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
