Versions updated.

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com
> wrote:

> Seems everything is ok,
>
> https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final&b=1.5.0-b1
> https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final&b=1.5.0-final
>
> I'll update versions.
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Anton Vinogradov <
> avinogra...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>
>> Dmitriy,
>>
>> that's not a big change, but we have to check it will not break something
>> else.
>> I'll check it today.
>>
>> Raul,
>>
>> Could you please check this solution is suitable for OSGi?
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
>> dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I filed the ticket:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226
>>>
>>> I think we should change dash to dot for now.
>>>
>>> Anton, can you explain why this is a big change?
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to rush
>>> and
>>> > produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.
>>> >
>>> > There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in
>>> the
>>> > versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion
>>> and
>>> > incompatibilities.
>>> >
>>> > Cos
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
>>> > > Cos,
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no
>>> chances
>>> > > for one more delay.
>>> > > Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
>>> > > Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 &
>>> 1.x.0.final
>>> > as
>>> > > a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some
>>> > other
>>> > > case.
>>> > >
>>> > > Raul & Sergi,
>>> > >
>>> > > Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good
>>> case?
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
>>> > avinogra...@gridgain.com
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Yakov,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
>>> > > > <
>>> >
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
>>> >
>>> > was
>>> > > > correct.
>>> > > > 1.5.0-b1
>>> > > > <
>>> >
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
>>> >
>>> > -
>>> > > > now correct too, was fixed.
>>> > > > Both (now) points to the same commit.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
>>> yzhda...@apache.org>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is
>>> that
>>> > > >> correct?
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Yakov
>>> > > >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" <c...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > Cos
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>>> > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
>>> > yzhda...@apache.org>
>>> > > >> > wrote:
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can
>>> > build
>>> > > >> > ignite
>>> > > >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
>>> > > >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have
>>> > included
>>> > > >> > OSGi.
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you
>>> actually
>>> > built
>>> > > >> > the
>>> > > >> > > release from?
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > Thanks,
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
>>> > > >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration,
>>> Big
>>> > Data
>>> > > >> and
>>> > > >> > > Messaging Engineer
>>> > > >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>>> > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>>> > > >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to