On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <[email protected] > wrote:
> So, basically, we want to add lockAll() method that locks entries without > returning their values to a client - this is a good idea. I do not want, > however, to call it SNAPSHOT isolation, because this is not what it is. > I think I see your point. All we need to do is allow for lock() and lockAll() invocations within a transaction, no? Do you know why we currently prohibit it?
