Great! I think I like “instanceName” better, just in case if this name will be provided for information purposes on other nodes.
D. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3207 > > I have stated "localInstanceName" there, because "instanceName" may not be > clear enough. > > Pavel. > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org > > > wrote: > > > I like the change, as long as we do not remove, but *deprecate* the > > gridName property and update all the documentation and examples. > > > > Pavel, can you please file a ticket? > > > > D. > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > We have got a TON of questions on gridName property. Everyone thinks > that > > > clusters are formed based on the gridName, that is, nodes with the same > > > grid name will join one cluster, and nodes with a different name will > be > > in > > > a separate cluster. > > > > > > I suggest to deprecate this property and add instanceName instead. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Pavel. > > > > > >
