Thanks for putting the docs together Prachi! I am also quite a bit surprised that Ignite has the support for AOP. As a side topic, and the one for an overall amusement:
- do people think it might be a good time to revisit the use of "last century" programming techniques, which are build time only, poorly supported by the modern IDEs and very sensitive to the underlying signature and control-flow changes? To make it clear, when I say 'build-time only' I meant that a (re)-compilation of the existing code is needed in order to inject the invocation hooks and change the control-flow of one's application. As a solid alternative, there's MOP after all, which is cleaner, more light-weight, and truly dynamic. Besides, do we see much of the use for AOP nowadays? The reason the topic has caught my attention, is my personal dissatisfaction with AOP frameworks in the past. And I don't see any evidences there are getting any better in the last 6-7 years. Cos On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:22PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Prachi, > > Looks good to me. > > If there is anyone in the community who made it hands dirty with AOP and > Ignite please review the documentation from Prachi as well. > > — > Denis > > > On May 27, 2016, at 2:17 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Prachi, > > > > Great, to be honest I didn’t suspect Ignite supports this functionality. > > > > Will try my hands dirty with the examples provided in the doc in the > > nearest days and will provide you with a feedback. > > > > — > > Denis > > > >> On May 26, 2016, at 9:56 PM, Prachi Garg <pg...@gridgain.com> wrote: > >> > >> Engineers, > >> > >> I have added documentation for AOP-based Grid Enabling - > >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/docs/aop-based-grid-enabling. > >> > >> Can someone please review? > >> > >> -P > > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
