Eduard, It's up to you :) I'm just saying that we should split the big task into smaller ones.
-Val On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Eduard Shangareev < eduard.shangar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Valentin. > I am going to close these ticket with some prototype and create new ones > (maybe, with umbrella one). > > Will it work? > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Eduard, > > > > This is too much information :) > > > > I think you should create separate tickets for different aspects of > Spring > > Data integration and use IGNITE-1192 only as an umbrella, because > otherwise > > it will be flooded by comments. This will allow to implement this > > functionality step by step and track the progress better. > > > > Agree? > > > > -Val > > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Eduard Shangareev < > > eduard.shangar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > So there is no async support for query, therefore we can't support > > futures > > > as return type (paragraph 2). > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Eduard Shangareev < > > > eduard.shangar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I have looked at Querydsl and QbE and I think their support should be > > > > postponed. > > > > > > > > > >
