Denis, Yes, I plan to complete it by that time. #Btw, RocketMQ first release (4.0.0) under Apache license is planned for this month. Roman
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 7:30 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: Roman, Makes perfect sense to me. Do you think we can release this feature in the nearest AI release (1.9 or 2.0) around February/March? — Denis > On Jan 10, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Roman Shtykh <rsht...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Denis, > I think our Kafka integration is the closest to what may be required for > RockerMQ. But also I wouldn't exclude expanding to Camel's approach in > future, thanks a lot for pointing to it! > Let's have it with other streamers as Yakov suggested, and let's discuss > again if something fancy is requested ;) > I will create a JIRA issue for that and ask RocketMQ developers for reviews > and suggestions from their side. Roman > > On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:12 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> >wrote: > > > Roman, > > Does it make sense to have corresponding integration modules in both projects? > > For instance, there is Camel and Ignite integration that is hosted in both > projects. > https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/camel > https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite > <https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite> > > I do believe that the modules are not 100% identical and the reason it’s done > this way might be because the modules use different Camel or Ignite > interfaces and concepts. Is this approach somehow related to RocketMQ and > Ignite? > > — > Denis > >> On Jan 9, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Roman Shtykh <rsht...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> Igniters, >> Recently I am looking into a new pub/sub messaging Apache incubator project >> called RocketMQ [1], originally developed at Alibaba. And I am thinking >> about implementing a streamer for Ignite. >> Do you think it has to be placed under modules/ of Ignite project, or better >> to have it together with other RocketMQ Community Projects [2]? I talked to >> the project's lead -- any approach seems to be ok. >> I anticipate quite frequent releases of the project this year (much more >> frequent than Ignite's), and I think it will be easier to release such >> integration updates with the 2nd approach, as soon as a new RocketMQ's (or >> Ignite's) version is available. >> Any thoughts? >> [1] http://rocketmq.apache.org/[2] https://github.com/rocketmq >> Roman > >