Hello everyone. Sergi, you wrote about the MVCC.
It's very interesting and perspective. Someone already does it? 2017-02-09 9:25 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Guys, I think we should explicitly state this on readme.io - Do not use > > DML > > within transactions. > > > > And probably throw an exception on such attempts. > > > > Absolutely agree. I would say that DML within transactions is not supported > yet. We expert to have support for it in version 2.x. > > > > --Yakov > > > > 2017-02-09 12:08 GMT+07:00 Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Not yet, we need MVCC over PageMemory for this. Probably it will arrive > > in > > > some 2.x version. > > > > > > Sergi > > > > > > 2017-02-09 7:42 GMT+03:00 Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > Guys (esp Alex P and Sergi), > > > > > > > > Do we preserve transactional semantics of updates? > > > > > > > > In other words, does the following make sense? and when it does not? > > > > > > > > startTx() > > > > insert into blabla... > > > > update bla bla... > > > > commit() > > > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > > > > > >
